Islam in Britain

Yet Another Jihad Massacre in UK; May Should Apologize and Resign

Unfortunately another terrorist attack has occurred in Britain and while the Aussie Conservative Blog extends the deepest of sympathies to those slain, now is not the time to regurgitate worthless platitudes along the lines of: ‘we must not let terrorism to change us’.

To the contrary, we must let this terrorism change us, in order to save the next score of innocents that the religion of peace next decides to massacre.

As to act otherwise would be to unconscionably sentence those murdered in Manchester, towards a legacy of an inconsequential, forgettable death.

May

Front Page, by Robert Spencer, May 23, 2017:

Here we go again. 19 people are dead and 50 wounded in a suspected jihad-martyrdom suicide bombing at an Ariana Grande concert in Manchester, a target that the jihad murderers apparently chose because of its concentration of pre-teens and tweens, so as to maximize the potential to “strike terror into the hearts of the enemies of Allah” (Qur’an 8:60). But don’t be unduly concerned: Britain’s criminally feckless Prime Minister Theresa May is on the job, saying in a statement: “We are working to establish the full details of what is being treated by the police as an appalling terrorist attack. All our thoughts are with the victims and the families of those who have been affected.”

As canned responses go, that one is particularly packaged, processed, and colorless. How grand that she is thinking about the victims and their families. And the police are on the job! Marvelous! Britons can go back to sleep, knowing that selfless public servants such as May are working tirelessly to protect them.

But there was one key element that May left out of her statement: an apology.

One of the things she should apologize for is the routine aspect of her response to this latest jihad massacre. There was nothing she said about this jihad attack that could not have been said about ten jihad massacres before it, and will not be said about the next ten. The Muslim Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, said after the jihad bombings in New York City in September 2016 that such attacks were “part and parcel of living in a big city” and that people would just have “to be prepared for these sorts of things” to happen, and May is behaving as if she has thoroughly internalized these instructions.

In reality, no one in a big city or a small one, or out on the farm, should ever accept jihad terror massacres as “part and parcel” of living there. Sadiq Khan’s statement was a declaration of his inability or unwillingness to do anything effective to counter the jihad threat.

And that brings us to the second and more important reason why May should apologize: because she and the political establishment she represents have allowed this to happen.

If it weren’t for the immigration policies that May and her Conservative Party, in collaboration with the other British establishment parties, have pursued for well over a decade, the jihadis who perpetrated this massacre may not have been in Britain at all. Of course, it may yet be discovered that they were “homegrown terrorists,” born and raised in the UK. But here again, the British political establishment has accommodated and appeased the Muslim community at every turn, allowing for the establishment of Sharia courts and partnering with numerous “moderates” who turned out, surprise surprise, really to be “extremists.”

Meanwhile, the full wrath of the British government has been unleashed upon those British citizens who have dared to dissent from this madness and to declare publicly their support for the preservation of British national security, as well as the national character and culture. All too many of these people have been hounded and persecuted, arrested and prosecuted on the flimsiest of pretexts. Others who were in a position to prosecute Muslim rape gangs hesitated for fear of being branded “racist.” May has, meanwhile barred foreign foes of jihad terror from entering the country at all (including me), while allowing the most hair-raising preachers of jihad violence to enter the country and preach all over it with impunity.

As she implemented these policies, what did May think would happen? What did Britons? Did they really think that by coddling their Muslim population, winking at the crimes Muslims committed in the name of Islam and in accord with its teachings, and muzzling all dissent from these policies, that it would make Muslims feel welcome in Britain, and that Muslims and non-Muslims would march arm-in-arm together into the glorious multicultural future?

In other words, did they really think that being nice to Muslims would make Muslims forget the jihad imperatives of the Qur’an and Sunnah? Did they really think that if they appeased their Muslim community, that they would be spared further jihad deaths?

They won’t. Manchester was “only the beginning,” said an Islamic State jihadi in a video released just after the massacre Monday night. And that is true: Manchester is only the beginning, thanks to Theresa May. If a modicum of sanity prevailed in Britain, she would be forced to apologize and resign in disgrace.

Instead, she is looking to be overwhelmingly elected to the Prime Minister’s office in her own right in the coming elections. Britons should enjoy that election, because they won’t be enjoying very many more of them….

Spencer also makes a particularly good point in a separate piece regarding Ariana Grande’s “I don’t have words” comment:

What’s ironic is that Ariana Grande and all these stars are ready with their expressions of sorrow and horror over the jihad attack last night, but would be just as ready to denounce President Trump for “Islamophobia” for trying to prevent attacks like this one from happening. Ariana Grande has no words? Here are some: “This was a jihad attack. Those who hold to the jihad doctrine should not be welcome in the UK or anywhere else. I call for the defense of human beings against jihad and the defense of women against Sharia oppression. Let my concert in Manchester be the last time this cruel terror is inflicted upon the free people of any free nation.”

For an excellent video which reflects my own personal views on the attack, see:

 

 

16 thoughts on “Yet Another Jihad Massacre in UK; May Should Apologize and Resign

  1. Aussie, do you write any blog posts yourself or do you primarily reblog? When someone Likes my stuff, I like to check out theirs as well to find out their writing style, their personal thoughts and how they express them. Please point me to what you think is the best commentary you’ve written and I’ll be happy to read it.

  2. I agree that May should resign. She has the same problem so many other western leaders have, which is a refusal to state who the enemy is and take a hard line against it. For political reasons and perhaps even for reasons tied to her own personal beliefs (if she has any), she doesn’t want to say or do what needs to be said or done. The same goes for Sadiq Khan, the major of London. Britain and the rest of the western world who are living under this scourge of rising Islamic terrorism need leaders like Winston Churchill, not Neville Chamberlain, who are willing to believe “the worst” IF it happens to be true, instead of pathetically trying to ignore the problem.

  3. In my essay I pointed out that the Aztecs distinguished completely their superstitious religion from governance, That reflects, and encourages, the ability to distinguish reality from a fiction “above” it. Governance has to be grounded in reality, thus divorced from fiction.

    By the way, the “West” did this, and did it formally after emperor Justinian ordered a (Pagan!) law professor to head a commission to refurbish Roman Law (by then nearly 13 centuries old. He gave just one instruction: to separate secular from religious law. Justinian’s refurbished law was immediately made law in the empire of the Franks (Imperium Francorum), which held (most of) Western Europe.

    Thus, both Aztecs and Western Europe separated superstitious church and reality-based state.

    1. Yes precisely, a separation between church and state is what Islam needs. And while I would encourage Muslims to seek this, I maintain some doubts over whether this is achievable.

Leave a Reply